The tribes need to be divided some way in the upcoming season of Survivor, how do you think they will be divided?
10,568
pages
ALL POSTS
GabrielJohn wrote:
I sure Hope so. I really Hope they use Redemption Island more. I Believe it is an Interesting Twist to the Game of Survivor. You make a Mistake and get Voted Out...now you have a Chance to Redeem Yourself of that Mistake via Duels to get back in the game. Please have Redemption Island back in this Season.
64.58.22.130 wrote: Since there's 20 it could be a lot like the first Blood v Water, where two don't get picked at all. Also, does anyone think that the name Second Chances screams Redemption Island??
I'm not sure they're going to use it, but if they do, then let it only be for pre-merge, as it takes up time that could be used for character development, and people could make it back in without having to strategize at all.
(Edited by H double J)
Personally, I see this bunch having two people for each of the following archetypes:
- Old School women (Kelly and Kimmi)
- Women with "Purple" edits (Monica and Kelley)
- Nerds (Spencer and Stephen)
- Women of color superfans (Tasha and Shirin)
- Strong middle-aged men (Savage and Terry)
- Female villains (Abi and Kass)
- Men with issues (Varner's sick mom and Vytas being Aras' antithesis)
- Gamebots with no personality (Jeremy and Joe)
- Pure duds - good TV, but zero nutritional strategic value (Keith and Woo)
- Cunning women (Ciera and PG)
(Edited by IAmNothing712)
0
IAmNothing712 wrote:
Personally, I see this bunch having two people for each of the following archetypes:
Personally, I see this bunch having two people for each of the following archetypes:
- Old School women (Kelly and Kimmi)
- Women with "Purple" edits (Monica and Kelley)
- Nerds (Spencer and Stephen)
- Women of color superfans (Tasha and Shirin)
- Strong middle-aged men (Savage and Terry)
- Female villains (Abi and Kass)
- Men with issues (Varner's sick mom and Vytas being Aras' antithesis)
- Gamebots with no personality (Jeremy and Joe)
- Pure duds - good TV, but zero nutritional strategic value (Keith and Woo)
- Cunning women (Ciera and PG)
As for Ciera, I never really saw her as much, and people really liked her. The 2 main things she did (that I remember) were vote out her mother, which didn't see like the smartest idea. The other thing was go to rocks, which could have been avoided had she simply voted with Hayden and Caleb the previous episode. Please explain to me why she was good in people's eyes?
(Edited by Haze0241)
Haze0241 wrote:
IAmNothing712 wrote:
Personally, I see this bunch having two people for each of the following archetypes:
As for Ciera, I never really saw her as much, and people really liked her. The 2 main things she did (that I remember) were vote out her mother, which didn't see like the smartest idea. The other thing was go to rocks, which could have been avoided had she simply voted with Hayden and Caleb the previous episode. Please explain to me why she was good in people's eyes?
Personally, I see this bunch having two people for each of the following archetypes:
- Old School women (Kelly and Kimmi)
- Women with "Purple" edits (Monica and Kelley)
- Nerds (Spencer and Stephen)
- Women of color superfans (Tasha and Shirin)
- Strong middle-aged men (Savage and Terry)
- Female villains (Abi and Kass)
- Men with issues (Varner's sick mom and Vytas being Aras' antithesis)
- Gamebots with no personality (Jeremy and Joe)
- Pure duds - good TV, but zero nutritional strategic value (Keith and Woo)
- Cunning women (Ciera and PG)
Ciera was subtle and took opportunities when she came by them such as joining Caleb in voting Brad out, joining Tyson's alliance, voting her mom out, most importantly, drawing rocks. She was observant to say the least.
(Edited by IAmNothing712)
Haze0241 wrote:
I'm hoping for 4 tribes of 5, like cook islands, and then after 2 people are out, make 2 tribes of 9, I think it would be more interesting than the normal 10 v 10 format
I'm hoping for 4 tribes of 5, like cook islands, and then after 2 people are out, make 2 tribes of 9, I think it would be more interesting than the normal 10 v 10 format
I agree but maybe it should change from 4 tribes of 5 to 2 tribes of 8
(Edited by PancakeGirl469)
I think they should have a schoolyard pick to make 3 tribes of 6 and two people eliminated, and the Outcasts tist should return.
(Edited by PancakeGirl469)
0
Coolboy18 wrote:
I think they should have a schoolyard pick to make 3 tribes of 6 and two people eliminated, and the Outcasts tist should return.
I think they should have a schoolyard pick to make 3 tribes of 6 and two people eliminated, and the Outcasts tist should return.
That would be a metaphorical kick in the balls to Andrew Savage, Also they probably will never do outcasts again
(Edited by Haze0241)
Really Coolboy18? You want 2 eliminated like Palau, and make the downfall of a tribe like in Pearl Islands, just because two people return? Both are unfavorable twists, which I don't hope to see again.
(Edited by H double J)
H double J wrote:
Really Coolboy18? You want 2 eliminated like Palau, and make the downfall of a tribe like in Pearl Islands, just because two people return? Both are unfavorable twists, which I don't hope to see again.
Really Coolboy18? You want 2 eliminated like Palau, and make the downfall of a tribe like in Pearl Islands, just because two people return? Both are unfavorable twists, which I don't hope to see again.
I think the outcasts were a good twist. It showed that you should be expecting the unexpected. And instead of the elimination of two in Palau, how about there is a tribe addition in the middle of the game (2 tribes of 10 and then 3 tribes of 5)
(Edited by PancakeGirl469)
Coolboy18 wrote:
H double J wrote:
Really Coolboy18? You want 2 eliminated like Palau, and make the downfall of a tribe like in Pearl Islands, just because two people return? Both are unfavorable twists, which I don't hope to see again.
I think the outcasts were a good twist. It showed that you should be expecting the unexpected. And instead of the elimination of two in Palau, how about there is a tribe addition in the middle of the game (2 tribes of 10 and then 3 tribes of 5)
Really Coolboy18? You want 2 eliminated like Palau, and make the downfall of a tribe like in Pearl Islands, just because two people return? Both are unfavorable twists, which I don't hope to see again.
So the two people not chosen would just join in the middle of the game without having to worry about be voted out or anything? Your think is illogical.
(Edited by Icetower42)