Thread:Ifoundalemontree/@comment-1827503-20121222183659/@comment-5870534-20121222191419

To prove my point, here is a change I made that you reverted:

I wrote: "Sandra is the only female winner to play a near "perfect" game of Survivor. Tijuana Bradley's jury vote for Lillian at Pearl Islands' final tribal council deprived Sandra of a perfect win."

You reverted it to: "Sandra is the only female winner to play a near "perfect" game of Survivor. Tijuana Bradley's jury vote for Lillian at Pearl Islands' final tribal council prevented Sandra from doing so."

Why do you think this version is better?

I can explain to you why this version is bad, and even wrong. Let's simplify this sentence, shall we?

Sandra is the only female winner to play a near "perfect" game of Survivor. Tijuana Bradley's jury vote for Lillian at Pearl Islands' final tribal council prevented Sandra from doing so.

So, it appears that Sandra played a near perfect game of Survivor, but Tijuana's vote for Lill prevented her from doing so. ---> Doing so = playing a near perfect game of Survivor.

So, we get that Sandra played a near perfect game of Survivor, but Tijuana prevented her from playing a near perfect game of Survivor.

This sentence makes absolutely no sense! So, why did you discard my change?