Board Thread:New on Survivor Wiki/@comment-26279876-20160125041417/@comment-6987998-20170131004013

HallsiKallsi wrote: The same can be said with Parvati in HvV, if Russell hadn't convinced Tyson to switch his vote, the most overrated player (Parv) wouldn't have made it to final tribal, and I said she did nothing except for getting rid of Erik, there's a reason why I mention that, Russell still owned the game, and there's no need to be a dick about this, this is simply a debate, and Russell still would've been in the final 3, since Russell played an idol the tribal Erik went home, so the same thing would've happened. So that argument was pretty invalid. :/ Russell didn't get any votes that TC, so that idol didn't make any difference. If Natalie hadn't convinced the Galus to vote for Erik, one of them would have gone home (Jaison, probably), then even if Kelly was voted out after that, it would still be 7-3 and John probably wouldn't flip, so Natalie goes home and then it's 7-2 and he would be toasted. And even if this scenario doesn't happen, anything could happen since when you change something, everything changes, that's what is called butterfly effect (:

If you can't understand that the game is not "vote out everybody amd get reward for it" and actually is "get to the end and convince the jury to vote for you", then you're a lost cause.