Board Thread:Virtual Tribal Council/@comment-27638357-20160519221405/@comment-27638357-20160527000656

LincolnAloisio wrote: You can't take the show as an evidence since that's only what the editors want to show us. They can literaly make someone disappear for the entire game and then put them at the FTC if they want to. It doesn't mean that that was what happened.

And since it seems ypu don't care about post-game information, I'm out because this is pointless.

Why can't we take the show as evidence? You can't put words in people's mouths. Evidence by film is the most accurate evidence. It's on our screens, so unless some CGI was used, I don't see why we can't use the show as evidence. Isn't that what the wiki is about? Us

I completely agree that the possibility we were told the wrong story might exist. However, until we have concrete evidence that suggests otherwise, if the story makes sense, we have no choice but to believe it. We could go into a million hypotheticals of what could have happened outside of the canon footage, but without facts, we never know for sure.

Again, I will admit that I am a rather new fan of Survivor, so maybe I'm off on certain things. But if I am to believe something, I need evidence and logic. It's part of the reason I posted this thread in the first place. I want to discuss the value in Michele's game from different peoples' perspective, to see why others might have a different opinion from me and what their logic is behind it. I don't believe that ignorance is bliss, personally, so I want to get to the bottom of the issue. I never like being content with the statements that I have. I'm sorry if I came off as abrasive or mean-spirited to you, but I'm really interested in hearing other peoples' opinions and refuting them. I enjoy debate.