User blog comment:Ḡwẵine Ḹٍٍkƨ Ĺiĸe Ͼềлȑềd/Dawn - the queen of the dog act/@comment-5870534-20130509191756/@comment-4190137-20130511010925

I'll tell you the same 10 dollar analogy told to Denisov.

If you ask someone to give you ten dollars (thinking you are going to pay them back) but then later deciding to not to pay them back.

In this instance, Dawn agreed that she wasn't going to not vote Brenda out by asking her to drop out of the immunity challenge. But Dawn later went ahead and did it. I know you are supposed to lie in this game, but to an extent to peer pressuring someone to drop out of an immunity challenge? Dawn should have either aimed to beat Brenda in the challenge fairly or not voted her out after she dropped out for her. As I keep on saying, it was simply a harsh dog act.