Board Thread:Virtual Tribal Council/@comment-1294345-20160922075848/@comment-27082203-20161215220835

LincolnAloisio wrote: "(...)but I actually told Ken about my mom. Ken is an incredibly genuine person and believes that the best people should get to the end. And I wanted him to know that there was no shame in going to the end with me. He was playing for his daughter and I was playing for my family as well. Dave was standing in the way of both of us winning. I had a final three deal with Ken and so did Dave, so he was going to have to break his deal with one of us. I wanted it to seem equal in terms of how bad it would feel to get rid of both of us." I don't see what's wrong with this at all.

Many people fail to address how important the social game of Survivor is. Adam and Ken bonded with each other, and you seem to underestimate how much these bonds matter in a game like this.

If Survivor wasn't also about the social game, then players like Russell Hantz would win every time. Speaking of which...

This may be a bit of an over-exageration, but Hannah, to me at least, felt like the Russell Hantz of this season. She had extreme paranoia, flipped on allies when it wasn't necessary, and overall, played the game in the way that alienated the jury.

If you can't convince the jury to vote for you, regardless of the circumstances, you don't deserve to win the game.

Also, you had said earlier that Hannah had flipped Ken over, and that Adam took credit for it, and yet your using this as an argument as to why Ken flipped on David.