Board Thread:Survivor: Wikia - Season 2/@comment-2228839-20130228002835/@comment-4062486-20130301140700

You made an error in your arguement right here. You said that winning challenges is only important for staying in before the merge - not true. Think of Parvati and Kelly (from Borneo) for example: both of those women fought their way to the top because had they not won one immunity challenge after another, both of them would have for sure been out of the game. You know well how they were targeted, since you have seen both of those seasons. Parvati in the end won the season of Micronesia. Same thing was with Tom in Palau: he was mainly a physical player. He won too. I think this proves well that being good at challenges isn't a weakness either. Being good at challenges in my opinion is at least as important as the social game. Why else is "outplay" put together with "outwit" and "outlast" on the Survivor logo?

Also, let me remind you that at one point all you wanted was to win an immunity challenge. So why are you all of the sudden bringing up Sandra? You were not really like her because: 1.You performed better at challenges, 2. When it came to the social game, yours wasn't as good as hers. If any of us was like Sandra this season, it was Zion.