Board Thread:Virtual Tribal Council/@comment-1294345-20160428081722/@comment-5277627-20160429111929

IAmNothing712 wrote: Just because someone doesn't have any nutritional TV value doesn't translate to him/her being a terrible winner. I hate it when so called Survivor "fans" (more like casual viewers for me) say they hate a winner because he or she wasn't as loud or visible as some others. They play to win, not to necessarily give you entertainment. I tend to rewatch a season to find out any subtle cues the editors might've thrown along the way, so if a player who wasn't really good TV all season long wins, I get some context behind his/her win (perfect example is Natalie White).

I hate to say it, but if loudness of character is your criteria of a great Survivor winner, you're a very dense person. It's not Michele's edit. She's literally done nothing but float this far, relying on the moves of other people.