Board Thread:Questions and Answers/@comment-1294345-20130903120904/@comment-11695680-20130908211550

Dkoolsurvivor wrote: Zingerace23 wrote: I'm done with this argument. OF COURSE all you people who opposed JUST WANT AN EXCUSE TO WIN THE ARGUMENT. IF THE MAJORITY OF THE VOTES VOTE SUPPORT IT SHOULD BE SUPPORT. STOP TRYING TO MAKE EXCUSES TO WIN THE ARGUMENT. IF THE BETTER ARGUMENT WON THAN HOW COME SURVIVOR CONTESTANTS WIN BECAUSE OF WHAT THE MAJORITY OF THE JURY SAYS? ANSWER ME THAT. Because the jury is voting for who had the best pitch, and we're not doing that, we're making the arguments and most likely whoever sells the best idea will win and that will be voted upon, comparing this disscusion with that of the jury isn't the best comparison. I think a better comparison would be us to the final 2 or three, we're setting forth our points and pitches, on this idea, and whoever has the best arugument will win. If it apears that I am making excuses just to win the argument then I am truly sorry because that is not my intent, I'm opposing this not because other people  have but because I strongly belive it is the best aproach for this wiki to take. If this goes the other way and a new wiki is made then I won;t complain, because if the concenus is made to do so then I will trust it to be the right decision  but before we come to any conclusion then I'm going to fight for what I think is the best route. This argument keeps getting better