Talk:Russell Hantz/@comment-10242823-20140213054623

I actually love reading the things people say to try and defend Russell. Let's face it, Russell's an ass, to put it simple. He ignored the most important part of the game; it's social one. You can be a challenge beast (Ozzy), or a Strategical Mastermind (Rob), but still end up losing the final jury vote because of your actions. Though Ozzy was actual only used as an example of a challenge beast, the Rob vs. Amber Jury can be used as the example that I'm referring to. When one goes out of his way to be a "dick", he's not going to win in the end.

As for Natalie winning Samoa. Did she deserve it? Hell yes. If you guys remember the Erik boot. Russell didn't do anything to make Erik get out 10-2. That was Natalie. So people who say that Natalie needed Russell, they're wrong. Russell, actually, wouldn't have been there if it weren't for Natalie. Jaison probably would've gone home that tribal (as he was being targeted).

It's kinda how Erik said in his Jury Speech:

''People will call you weak. People will say that you are undeserving. Why are those characteristics any '''less admirable than lying, cheating, and stealing? Perception is not reality. ''Y'ou sitting there makes you just as dangerous as any of those guys there.

No matter how hard you try and defend Russell about being a mastermind, and Natalie being (I think the term is a goat but I use the term sheep). Natalie won in the end against the "mastermind" that is Russell Hantz. And that makes Natalie an amazing winner in my books. I kinda rambled on here, I don't even know where I was going with this. So:

'''tl;dr- Russell Hantz sucks, Natalie was a deserving winner. GL'''