Board Thread:Virtual Tribal Council/@comment-1294345-20160428081722/@comment-6987998-20160428163319

Aspiring wrote: I say this with every winner, even Natalie White and Boston Rob (who had to play four times to actually get a win) ... it doesn't matter what you did, how you did it, or how boring/uninspired your gameplay is. If you get to the end and you get the votes, whether through respect of the jury or because you were the lesser of two/three evils, then you deserve it. There's no ifs, ands, or buts about it. You did what you came there to do -- you outlasted fifteen to nineteen other people to win. And no one can take that away from anyone.

As far as entertainment, no Michele isn't a very interesting winner. But I wouldn't say she'd be an awful winner either. She'd be more middle ground for me. I wouldn't be terribly disappointed if she won. Actually, if it's one of her, Aubry, or Cydney, I'm just peachy.

I don't want Tai or Jason to win. Exactly.

UltraBubbles wrote: LincolnAloisio wrote: We could see Cirie winning both Panama and Micronesia, Yau-Man winning Fiji... and we all know what happened :)

Aubry has almost the exact same edit as them, and I'm not saying she will be the last voted out, but don't be shocked when/if it happens. Oh no, I can totally see that outcome as well. It would be unfortunate, but I do think she has a better shot than a Yau-Man at squeezing threw to the finals. She definitely has a shot of winning final immunity as well.

Honestly though, I see her edit as more close to the Natalie Anderson edit, in my own opinion. IDK, at least from my point of view, Natalie was way more UTR than Aubry.