Board Thread:News and Announcements/@comment-1294345-20170616031817/@comment-26856630-20171108192411

Ifoundalemontree wrote: 1. The question is: do people actually need to understand them? Why would anyone care for a version of "Survivor" they can't watch because it is in a language they don't understand?

2. This is yet another problem: the people who write the articles about the international versions usually do this in poor English, so the articles need to be edited later by someone with a better lever of English/a native speaker, which just leads to more work, and since almost no one does this, the Wiki looks really bad. I mean, even the US Survivor articles have to be rewritten, so what does it mean about the articles about international versions, especially non-English language ones? 1. If you don't care doesn't mean others don't care. I for once am interested to see how the other versions look, their own twists and the differences from the five versions I watched (US, Israel, Australia, NZ and South africa). It's cool to see how other countries interpretate survivor, even if I can't watch them. But having them here allows me and others to at least read about them in organized and pictured manner.

2. Not everyone have top-notch English in their pocket, especially in grammar. Imo that's the admins job to correct any grammatical mistakes and educate the ones who edit those pages on how to do it properly. Talk to those people and cooperate with them. Not berate them how poor of a job they are doing. I mean, if not that, then why are they for? It's part of their job to rewrite articles on here, and if it's too much, then it should be considered to add more admins than 10. (If I'm not mistaken that is the rule for the maximum admins)