Board Thread:Virtual Tribal Council/@comment-1294345-20160922075848/@comment-2142533-20161216224256

Copper5 wrote: We need smaller juries, ten is way too big. I think it's encouraging group-think (why the jury has voted unanimously twice in this format).

It's weird but I felt group-think in juries...isn't bad, but it should show that the number of votes a jury gets is not a measure of how good of a winner the player is. You see how friendly these players are this season, that it's not hard to compare notes and see who together they may decided as the deserving winner. Previous juries don't have it because of more animosity towards the other jury members which means less likely note-sharing. A vote for someone may also be a vote against a certain jury member, and we aren't going to get that this season.