User blog comment:Ḡwẵine Ḹٍٍkƨ Ĺiĸe Ͼềлȑềd/Returning Players My Ass/@comment-24079733-20130715112700

The problem with the fans is that, we often say that "it will be a terrible season" but we end up still watching it XD

I think that they should do like something like what The Hunger Games has. (I'm a huge huge fan of it and it was clearly based from Survivor.) without the killing of course lol. Just the pattern of how each games is being held.

In there there were like a different type of Games every 25th year aka Quarter Quell. For the first 24, all the tributes are all new, then for the 25th...the people will vote for those who want to represent their District (usually 2/District). Survivor can do this, they will release some 50 applicants for the show on their site and we can vote of who we want to see on the game.

Then new players again for the next 24, then at the 50th there is some twist that recquire the 12 Districts to send  twice as normal (4/District.) It'll be too many for Survivor I guess.

Then for the next 24, all new again. Then at the 75th they had a twist that's the same as All-Stars only that the 75th requires 24 Winners. This is how will Survivor end.

My point is that, there should be a certain gap between special seasons. For example, Survivor: Micronesia, could've been held  seven seasons after (which they did) then Heroes vs. Villains could've been held the same seven seasons after Micronesia. (It might have been too long but it'll be worth the wait) then seven seasons later...Survivor: Caramoan. Then seven seasons later another exciting twist is introduced, like Blood vs. Water. SO NO ONE WILL GET TIRED OF THE SAME FACES PLAYING BACK TO BACK OR A FEW SEASONS LATER.

Just a thought.